- P-ISSN 2233-4203
- E-ISSN 2093-8950
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN2233-4203
- E-ISSN2093-8950
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Fungal Secretome for Biorefinery: Recent Advances in Proteomic Technology
Mass Spectrometry Letters / Mass Spectrometry Letters, (P)2233-4203; (E)2093-8950
2013, v.4 no.1, pp.1-9
https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2013.4.1.1
(Nanyang Technological University)
(Nanyang Technological University)
(Nanyang Technological University)
Adav,
S. S., &
Sze,
S.
K.
(2013). Fungal Secretome for Biorefinery: Recent Advances in Proteomic Technology. Mass Spectrometry Letters, 4(1), 1-9, https://doi.org/10.5478/MSL.2013.4.1.1
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Fungal biotechnology has been well established in food and healthcare sector, and now being explored for lignocellulosic biorefinery due to their great potential to produce a wide array of extracellular enzymes for nutrient recycling. Due to global warming, environmental pollution, green house gases emission and depleting fossil fuel, fungal enzymes for lignocellulosic biomass refinery become a major focus for utilizing renewal bioresources. Proteomic technologies tender better biological understanding and exposition of cellular mechanism of cell or microbes under particular physiological condition and are very useful in characterizing fungal secretome. Hence, in addition to traditional colorimetric enzyme assay, mass-spectrometry-based quantification methods for profiling lignocellulolytic enzymes have gained increasing popularity over the past five years. Majority of these methods include two dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry, differential stable isotope labeling and label free quantitation. Therefore, in this review, we reviewed more commonly used different proteomic techniques for profiling fungal secretome with a major focus on two dimensional gel electrophoresis, liquid chromatography-based quantitative mass spectrometry for global protein identification and quantification. We also discussed weaknesses and strengths of these methodologies for comprehensive identification and quantification of extracellular proteome.
- keywords
- Proteomics, LC-MS/MS, Fungal Secretome, Biorefinery, Lignocellulosic biomass
Reference
1
Galagan, J. E.. (2003). . Nature, 422, 859-.
2
Pel, H. J.. (2007). . Nat. Biotechnol, 25, 221-.
3
Galagan, J. E.. (2005). . Nature, 438, 1105-.
4
Machida, M.. (2005). . Nature, 438, 1157-.
5
Van Den Berg, M. A.. (2008). . Nat. Biotechnol, 26, 1161-.
6
Martinez, D.. (2008). . Nat. Biotechnol, 26, 553-.
7
Martinez, D. (2004). . Nat. Biotechnol, 22, 695-.
8
Martinez, D.. (2009). . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 106, 1954-.
9
Kim, Y.. (2007). . Trends Biotechnol, 25, 395-.
10
Martínez, A. T. (2009). . Curr. Opin. Biotechnol, 20, 348-.
11
Baldrian, P. (2006). . FEMS Microbiol. Rev, 30, 215-.
12
Brogioni, B. (2008). . PCCP, 10, 7284-.
13
Rubin, E. M. (2008). . Nature, 454, 841-.
14
Edens, W. A.. (1999). . Appl.Environ. Microbiol, 65, 3071-.
15
Iyer, G. (2003). . FEMS Microbiol. Lett, 227, 121-.
16
Binz, T. (1997). . Curr. Microbiol, 35, 278-.
17
Palonen, H. (2003). . EnzymeMicrob. Technol, 33, 854-.
18
Kiiskinen, L. L. (2002). . Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 59, 198-.
19
Thakker, G. D. (1992). . Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 37, 321-.
20
Froehner, S. C. (1974). . J. Bacteriol, 120, 458-.
21
Monteoliva, L. (2004). . Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic, 3, 220-.
22
Oda, K. (2006). . Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 72, 3448-.
23
Ribeiro, D. A.. (2012). . PLoS One, 7, -.
24
Manavalan, T. (2012). . Proteomics, 77, 298-.
25
Zorn, H. (2005). . Proteomics, 5, 4832-.
26
Ghosh, M.. (1998). . Acta Biotechnol, 18, 243-.
27
Mata, G.. (1998). . World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 14, 513-.
28
Hori, C. (2011). . FEMSMicrobiol. Lett, 321, 14-.
29
Sato, S. (2007). . Microbiology, 153, 3023-.
30
Wymelenberg, A. V. (2005). . Biotechnol, 118, 17-.
31
Eriksson, K. E.. (1975). . Eur. J. Biochem, 51, 213-.
32
Eriksson, K. E. (1975). . Eur. J. Biochem, 51, 193-.
33
Streamer, M.. (1975). . Eur. J. Biochem, 59, 607-.
34
Hao, P. (2010). . J. Proteome Res, 9, 3520-.
35
Hao, P. (2011). . J. Proteome Res, 10, 5568-.
36
Alpert, A. (2008). . J. Anal. Chem, 80, 62-.
37
Adav, S. S. (2012). . Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 11, -.
38
Adav, S. S. (2010). . J. Proteome Res, 9, 3932-.
39
Adav, S. S. (2012). . J. Proteomics, 75, 5590-.
40
Adav, S. S. (2012). . J. Proteomics, 75, 1493-.
41
Bantscheff, M. (2007). . Anal. Bioanal. Chem, 389, 1017-.
42
Xie, F. (2011). . J. Biol. Chem, 286, 25443-.
43
Evans, C. (2012). . Anal.Bioanal. Chem, 404, 1011-.
44
Noire, J.. (2011). . Curr. Proteomics, 8, 17-.
45
Thompson, A. (2003). . Anal. Chem, 75, 1895-.
46
Adav, S. S.. (2010). . ProteomeRes, 9, 3016-.
47
Le Crom, S.. (2009). . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 106, 16151-.
48
Manavalan, A. (2011). . J. Proteomics, 75, 642-.
49
Wymelenberg, A. V. (2010). . Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 76, 3599-.
50
Wu, W. W. (2006). . J. Proteome Res, 5, 651-.
51
Chee, S. G. (2007). . J. Proteome Res, 6, 821-.
52
Karp, N. A.. (2010). . Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 9, 1885-.
53
Patel, V. J.. (2009). . J. Proteome Res, 8, 3752-.
54
Pierce, A. (2008). . Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 7, 853-.
55
Bantscheff, M. (2008). . Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 7, 1702-.
56
Köcher, T. (2009). . Proteome Res, 8, 4743-.
57
Wang, H. (2012). . J. Proteome Res, 11, 487-.
58
Griffin, T. J. (2007). . Proteome Res, 6, 4200-.
59
Dayon, L. (2010). . J. Proteomics, 73, 769-.
60
Olsen, J. V. (2007). . Nat. Methods, 4, 709-.
61
Swaney, D. L. (2007). . Anal. Chem, 79, 477-.
62
Shirran, S. L. (2010). . J. Proteomics, 73, 1391-.
63
Onsongo, G. (2010). . J.Proteomics, 10, 3533-.
64
Christoforou, A. L. (2012). . Anal. Bioanal. Chem, 404, 1029-.
65
Ong, S. E. (2002). . Molecular & CellularProteomics: MCP, 1, 376-.
66
Tian, C. (2009). . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 106, 22157-.
67
Phillips, C. M. (2011). . J. ProteomeRes, 10, 4177-.
68
Kota, U. (2011). . Phytochemistry, 72, 1040-.
69
Washburn, M. P. (2001). . Nat. Biotechnol, 19, 242-.
70
Yao, X. (2001). . Anal. Chem, 73, 2836-.
71
Gygi, S. P. (1999). . Nat. Biotechnol, 17, 994-.
72
Ishihama, Y. (2005). . Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 4, 1265-.
73
Matzke, M. M. (2012). . Proteomics, , -.
74
Tang, K. (2004). . J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom, 15, 1416-.
75
Chelius, D. (2002). . J. Proteome Res, 1, 317-.
76
Adav, S. S. (2012). . J. Proteomics, 75, 3694-.
77
Adav, S. S. (2011). . J. Proteome Res, 10, 4579-.
78
Gerber, S. A. (2003). . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 100, 6940-.
- Submission Date
- 2013-03-03
- Revised Date
- 2013-03-20
- Accepted Date
- 2013-03-21
Other articles from this issue
- Fungal Secretome for Biorefinery: Recent Advances in Proteomic Technology
- Multi-Level Characterization of Protein Glycosylation
- Development of Analytical Technology Using the HS-SPME-GC/FID for Monitoring Aromatic Solvents in Urine
- Optimization in Detecting Multiply-charged Protein Ions using MALDI TOF-MS
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.